angelic

Chapter 8 - The Cake Case

Diane filed a complaint over the cake.

Of course.

So did I regarding Emma’s slap.

Both existed.

The prosecutor separated them.

Diane:

Misdemeanor battery involving a minor.

No serious injury.

No prior record.

The state also considered child-abuse language under local statute because an adult intentionally struck a ten-year-old, but ultimately charged narrowly.

Me:

Misdemeanor battery/disorderly conduct for intentionally throwing cake into Diane’s face.

Diane claimed candle scratched near her eyebrow.

Photograph showed small superficial mark.

No stitches.

I accepted diversion.

Anger-management course.

Community service.

No unlawful contact with Diane.

Dismissal after completion.

I did not frame cake as defense of Emma.

The slap was over.

I had already moved.

Cake was fury.

I told Emma.

“Mom got a class.”

She almost smiled.

“For cake?”

“Yes.”

“Grandma?”

“She has her own case.”

“Because slap.”

“Yes.”

“Both.”

“Yes.”

Then she asked:

“Do you wish you didn’t throw it?”

“Yes.”

“Why?”

“Because you needed me calm more than Diane needed frosting.”

Emma thought.

“It was still kind of funny.”

I sighed.

“I know.”

That was the family’s allowed private joke later.

Not now.

Diane initially fought her charge.

Then security footage from dining room? We had home cameras only foyer maybe. Better: two relatives had phone video beginning after first swat but caught slap? Emma's cousin teen filmed cake before, inadvertently captured slap. Enough.

Diane pleaded guilty several months later.

Probation.

Community service.

No unsupervised contact with Emma or Lily without parental/court agreement.

Family-boundaries counseling.

No jail.

Proportionate.

At sentencing, she said:

“I was angry.”

The judge asked:

“At a child?”

Diane:

“At her mother.”

“Then why hit the child?”

May you like

Silence.

That was the whole story.

Other posts