Chapter 10

The missing four minutes became more important than the words Glen kept.
A forensic audio analyst could not reconstruct sound that no longer existed on the copy, but Clara’s phone contained an earlier synchronization log. It indicated that the original file had once been longer.
Detective Ruiz obtained a search warrant for Glen’s company laptop and a court-authorized copy of specified cloud data. The process did not produce immediate revelations. Digital investigations were not magic. Encrypted devices, deleted files, and corporate systems required time.
Meanwhile, Clara’s independent obstetrician approved a noninvasive prenatal parentage test.
The test required blood from Clara and DNA samples from the possible genetic parents. Clara consented. Glen initially refused.
His refusal did not prove anything.
It created pressure.
After his attorney advised him that continued refusal could affect the civil proceedings and his credibility with the trust, he agreed to provide a witnessed cheek swab.
I provided mine.
The laboratory warned that results could identify whether the pregnancy was genetically consistent with Glen and me, but limitations existed. Low fetal DNA fraction, multiple embryos, laboratory error, or unusual genetic relationships could complicate interpretation.
We were told to expect results within ten business days.
On the third day, Clara called me directly from an unknown number.
“I need to see you alone.”
“No.”
“Glen is watching my accounts.”
“Then speak to your lawyer.”
“She doesn’t know everything.”
“That is your choice.”
“Mara, Nadine wasn’t working only for Glen.”
I stopped breathing.
“Who else?”
“I don’t know.”
“Then what do you know?”
Clara lowered her voice.
“The money Glen sent through my company didn’t stay there. Most of it was forwarded automatically.”
“To whom?”
“A company called Blue Heron Patient Services.”
Rebecca’s financial investigators had already seen the name. It was registered in Delaware through a commercial agent. Its beneficial ownership was obscured behind another limited liability company.
“What did Nadine say about the barcode?” I asked.
Clara began to cry.
“She said the clinic had an old problem. Something that happened before she worked there.”
“What kind of problem?”
“I don’t know.”
“You keep saying that.”
“Because Glen told me not to ask.”
“And you obeyed.”
“Yes.”
The word was almost inaudible.
“Why?”
“Because I owed him.”
“For what?”
Clara remained silent for so long that I thought the call had disconnected.
Then she told me about her salon.
Two years earlier, the business failed after she used sales-tax funds to cover payroll. She intended to repay the money when revenue improved. It did not. The unpaid taxes and penalties grew.
Glen helped her negotiate a payment plan.
He also created invoices showing that Bennett Harbor Logistics had purchased promotional services from her salon.
The services were exaggerated.
Some never occurred.
Glen used the payments to keep the salon alive for six more months.
“When it failed,” Clara said, “he told me the invoices could look like fraud if anyone examined them.”
“He made you dependent.”
“I let him.”
There was responsibility in the statement, but not yet enough.
“He said carrying the embryo would clear everything. The tax debt. The invoices. The money I owed him.”
“And sleeping with him?”
“That was not part of the deal.”
“No. That was a choice.”
She did not defend herself.
Then she said something I did not expect.
“I’m afraid of him.”
“Has he threatened you?”
“Not directly.”
“What did he do?”
“He sent me a copy of the surrogacy contract after the pool party. The version he sent me now is different from the one I signed.”
“How?”
“The termination section.”
My body tensed.
The original agreement Clara reviewed stated that medical decisions remained hers after consultation with physicians, consistent with state law.
The new copy contained a clause imposing financial penalties if she acted against instructions from the intended parents.
Such a clause could be legally unenforceable. It could still frighten someone who believed she owed hundreds of thousands of dollars.
“How large are the penalties?”
“Everything he paid, plus damages.”
“Do not meet him alone.”
“I already did.”
“When?”
“Last night.”
My voice rose despite myself.
“What happened?”
“He wanted my phone.”
“Did you give it to him?”
“No.”
“Did he touch you?”
“No. He just said that accidents happen when scared people start talking.”
That was close enough to a threat.
I called Rebecca from another phone and kept Clara talking until her attorney could reach her.
Clara agreed to stay with Vivian temporarily and report the conversation to police.
Glen denied making any threat.
Without a recording or witness, the statement became another disputed fact.
That evening, the clinic’s audit team reported that the physical storage tank contained a straw labeled E2-7714-B.
My embryo’s identifier.
It appeared to still be in storage.
The news should have brought relief.
Instead, it made the mystery worse.
If Embryo B remained frozen, what had been transferred into Clara?
Northlake cautioned that the label had not yet been verified against genetic material. Opening or testing the straw could risk the embryo and required legal authorization and consent analysis.
A label was not proof of contents.
The clinic also identified an empty slot in the tank’s inventory.
The missing specimen was E2-7714-D.
According to historical records recovered from an offline server, Embryo D had never belonged to me.
It belonged to a different patient.
The patient’s name was sealed from us.
But the creation date was visible.
May you like
April 2018.
One year after Ariel was born.