Chapter 16 - THE MECHANIC’S TESTIMONY
The death trial began six months later.
Victoria, Leonard, and Edward sat at separate tables because their defenses conflicted.
Edward had already pleaded guilty and testified under cooperation.
Paul Dreyer described the brake-line fitting.
He demonstrated how normal pressure could loosen it after repeated use.
The defense showed he had accepted money and fled.
He admitted both.
Then prosecutors displayed his archived messages with Edward and Leonard.
Charles’s route.
The service time.
The payment.
The instruction not to retain the original part.
A traffic reconstruction expert explained that the failure caused Charles to lose braking on a curve.
Weather was clear.
Speed was normal.
The crash was not accidental.
Victoria’s attorney argued no message said kill Charles.
The prosecution agreed.
They pursued conspiracy and felony-related homicide theories based on knowingly disabling a vehicle to stop him.
Intent to frighten or delay did not make the method safe.
For Anna’s death, building records and Hayes maintenance logs showed the crew entered her apartment.
Martin Vale admitted falsifying the inspection.
A surviving worker testified that Victoria ordered the vent blocked.
He believed they were creating enough carbon monoxide odor to force Anna outside.
Carbon monoxide has no odor.
No qualified technician supervised them.
They left without testing levels.
Anna died.
The worker had remained silent because Hayes paid his mortgage and threatened immigration consequences for his brother-in-law.
His vulnerability explained leverage.
It did not erase participation.
Edward testified that Victoria used the phrase about dead people after learning Anna was dead.
The defense attacked his plea deal.
The message archive corroborated him.
Leonard testified and blamed Edward.
He claimed he approved only financial pressure.
Emails showed him authorizing payment to the maintenance crew and mechanic.
He said he never read details.
Another man using unread documents as defense.
Victoria did not testify this time.
Her kitchen statement entered only through a limited ruling connected to witness intimidation, not as proof of homicide intent by itself.
The jury deliberated nine days.
Leonard was convicted of conspiracy, financial fraud, obstruction, and homicide-related charges in both deaths.
Edward’s plea stood.
Victoria was convicted of conspiracy in Charles’s death, felony murder in Anna’s death, trust fraud, and obstruction.
She was acquitted of one count alleging she personally directed the precise brake defect because evidence showed Edward and Leonard chose the component.
The mixed verdict mattered.
The jury assigned responsibility without turning Victoria into the sole architect of every crime.
At sentencing, Anna’s former coworkers spoke.
Cole employees spoke about foundation losses.
I spoke about my mother.
“She was not a servant who wandered into family business. She was an employee who recognized fraud and a grandmother trying to protect a child before birth.”
Nathan spoke about Charles.
“My father delayed truth because he believed he could solve the danger first. That mistake did not authorize anyone to kill him.”
The sentences were lengthy.
Medical care, appeals, and legal rights remained.
Accountability did not require cruelty in return.
May you like
The dead people’s secrets had entered the public record.
They no longer belonged to Victoria.
